Recommended reading
This chapter builds on the previous chapter with background on asynchronous programming in JavaScript.
Promises are a technique for delivering results asynchronously.
The following code is an example of using the Promise-based function addAsync()
(whose implementation is shown soon):
addAsync(3, 4)
.then(result => { // success
assert.equal(result, 7);
})
.catch(error => { // failure
assert.fail(error);
});
Promises are similar to the event pattern: There is an object (a Promise), where we register callbacks:
.then()
registers callbacks that handle results.
.catch()
registers callbacks that handle errors.
A Promise-based function returns a Promise and sends it a result or an error (if and when it is done). The Promise passes it on to the relevant callbacks.
In contrast to the event pattern, Promises are optimized for one-off results:
.then()
and .catch()
because they both return Promises. That helps with sequentially invoking multiple asynchronous functions. More on that later.
What is a Promise? There are two ways of looking at it:
This is an implementation of a Promise-based function that adds two numbers x
and y
:
function addAsync(x, y) {
return new Promise(
(resolve, reject) => { // (A)
if (x === undefined || y === undefined) {
reject(new Error('Must provide two parameters'));
} else {
resolve(x + y);
}
});
}
addAsync()
immediately invokes the Promise
constructor. The actual implementation of the functionality resides in the callback that is passed to that constructor (line A). That callback is provided with two functions:
resolve
is used for delivering a result (in case of success).
reject
is used for delivering an error (in case of failure).
The Promise constructor uses the revealing constructor pattern:
const promise = new Promise(
(resolve, reject) => {
// ···
}
);
Quoting Domenic Denicola, one of the people behind JavaScript’s Promise API:
I call this the revealing constructor pattern because the
Promise
constructor is revealing its internal capabilities, but only to the code that constructs the promise in question. The ability to resolve or reject the promise is only revealed to the constructing code, and is crucially not revealed to anyone using the promise. So if we hand offp
to another consumer, say
doThingsWith(p);
then we can be sure that this consumer cannot mess with any of the internals that were revealed to us by the constructor. This is as opposed to, for example, putting
resolve
andreject
methods onp
, which anyone could call.
Figure 42.1 depicts the three states a Promise can be in. Promises specialize in one-off results and protect us against race conditions (registering too early or too late):
.then()
callback or a .catch()
callback too early, it is notified once a Promise is settled.
.then()
or .catch()
are called after the settlement, they receive the cached value.
Additionally, once a Promise is settled, its state and settlement value can’t change anymore. That helps make code predictable and enforces the one-off nature of Promises.
This is an example of a Promise that is never settled and forever pending:
new Promise(() => {})
If the callback of new Promise()
calls resolve(x)
then it depends on x
what happens to the newly created Promise p
:
x
is a non-Promise value then p
is fulfilled with x
.
x
is a Promise, then the state of p
locked on the state of x
. That is:
x
is fulfilled, p
is fulfilled.
x
is rejected, p
is rejected.
x
never settles, p
never settles either.
In other words: The operation resolve
only determines the fate of a Promise; it may or may not fulfill it.
Promise.resolve()
and Promise.reject()
If x
is a non-Promise value then Promise.resolve(x)
creates a Promise that is fulfilled with that value:
Promise.resolve(123)
.then(x => {
assert.equal(x, 123);
});
If the argument is already a Promise, it is returned unchanged:
const abcPromise = Promise.resolve('abc');
assert.equal(
Promise.resolve(abcPromise), abcPromise
);
Promise.reject(err)
accepts a value err
(that is normally not a Promise) and returns a Promise that is rejected with it:
const myError = new Error('My error!');
Promise.reject(myError)
.catch(err => {
assert.equal(err, myError);
});
Why is that useful?
Promise.resolve()
to convert a value that may or may not be a Promise to a value that is guaranteed to be a Promise.
Promise.resolve()
and Promise.reject()
– as demonstrated by the example below.
function convertToNumber(stringOrNumber) {
if (typeof stringOrNumber === 'number') {
return Promise.resolve(stringOrNumber);
} else if (typeof stringOrNumber === 'string') {
return stringToNumberAsync(stringOrNumber);
} else {
return Promise.reject(new TypeError());
}
}
.then()
callbacks.then()
handles Promise fulfillments. It also returns a new Promise. Doing so enables method chaining: We can invoke .then()
and .catch()
on the result and keep the asynchronous computation going.
How the Promise returned by .then()
is resolved, depends on what happens inside its callback. Let’s look at three common cases.
.then()
callbackFirst, the callback can return a non-Promise value (line A). Consequently, the Promise returned by .then()
is fulfilled with that value (as checked in line B):
Promise.resolve('abc')
.then(str => {
return str + str; // (A)
})
.then(str2 => {
assert.equal(str2, 'abcabc'); // (B)
});
.then()
callbackSecond, the callback can return a Promise q
(line A). Consequently, the Promise p
returned by .then()
is resolved with q
. In other words: p
is effectively replaced by q
.
Promise.resolve('abc')
.then(str => {
return Promise.resolve(123); // (A)
})
.then(num => {
assert.equal(num, 123);
});
Why is that useful? We can return the result of a Promise-based operation and process its fulfillment value via a “flat” (non-nested) .then()
. Compare:
// Flat
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
/*···*/
return asyncFunc2();
})
.then(result2 => {
/*···*/
});
// Nested
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
/*···*/
asyncFunc2()
.then(result2 => {
/*···*/
});
});
.then()
callbackThird, the callback can throw an exception. Consequently, the Promise returned by .then()
is rejected with that exception. That is, a synchronous error is converted into an asynchronous error.
const myError = new Error('My error!');
Promise.resolve('abc')
.then(str => {
throw myError;
})
.catch(err => {
assert.equal(err, myError);
});
.catch()
and its callbackThe difference between .then()
and .catch()
is that the latter is triggered by rejections, not fulfillments. However, both methods turn the actions of their callbacks into Promises in the same manner. For example, in the following code, the value returned by the .catch()
callback in line A becomes a fulfillment value:
const err = new Error();
Promise.reject(err)
.catch(e => {
assert.equal(e, err);
// Something went wrong, use a default value
return 'default value'; // (A)
})
.then(str => {
assert.equal(str, 'default value');
});
.then()
and .catch()
always returning Promises enables us to create arbitrary long chains of method calls:
function myAsyncFunc() {
return asyncFunc1() // (A)
.then(result1 => {
// ···
return asyncFunc2(); // a Promise
})
.then(result2 => {
// ···
return result2 ?? '(Empty)'; // not a Promise
})
.then(result3 => {
// ···
return asyncFunc4(); // a Promise
});
}
Due to chaining, the return
in line A returns the result of the last .then()
.
In a way, .then()
is the asynchronous version of the synchronous semicolon:
asyncFunc1().then(asyncFunc2)
executes the asynchronous operations asyncFunc1
and asyncFunc2
sequentially.
syncFunc1(); syncFunc2()
executes the synchronous operations syncFunc1
and syncFunc2
sequentially.
We can also add .catch()
into the mix and let it handle multiple error sources at the same time:
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
// ···
return asyncFunction2();
})
.then(result2 => {
// ···
})
.catch(error => {
// Failure: handle errors of asyncFunc1(), asyncFunc2()
// and any (sync) exceptions thrown in previous callbacks
});
Promise.prototype.finally()
[ES2018]The Promise method .finally()
is often used as follows:
somePromise
.then((result) => {
// ···
})
.catch((error) => {
// ···
})
.finally(() => {
// ···
})
;
The .finally()
callback is always executed – independently of somePromise
and the values returned by .then()
and/or .catch()
. In contrast:
.then()
callback is only executed if somePromise
is fulfilled.
.catch()
callback is only executed if:
somePromise
is rejected,
.then()
callback returns a rejected Promise,
.then()
callback throws an exception.
.finally()
ignores what its callback returns and simply passes on the settlement that existed before it was called:
Promise.resolve(123)
.finally(() => {})
.then((result) => {
assert.equal(result, 123);
});
Promise.reject('error')
.finally(() => {})
.catch((error) => {
assert.equal(error, 'error');
});
If, however, the .finally()
callback throws an exception, the Promise returned by .finally()
is rejected:
Promise.reject('error (originally)')
.finally(() => {
throw 'error (finally)';
})
.catch((error) => {
assert.equal(error, 'error (finally)');
});
.finally()
: cleaning upOne common use case for .finally()
is similar to a common use case of the synchronous finally
clause: cleaning up after you are done with a resource. That should always happen, regardless of whether everything went smoothly or there was an error – for example:
let connection;
db.open()
.then((conn) => {
connection = conn;
return connection.select({ name: 'Jane' });
})
.then((result) => {
// Process result
// Use `connection` to make more queries
})
// ···
.catch((error) => {
// handle errors
})
.finally(() => {
connection.close();
});
.finally()
: doing something first after any kind of settlementWe can also use .finally()
before both .then()
and .catch()
. Then what we do in the .finally()
callback is always executed before the other two callbacks. As an example, consider the following function handleAsyncResult()
:
function handleAsyncResult(promise) {
return promise
.finally(() => {
console.log('finally');
})
.then((result) => {
console.log('then ' + result);
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log('catch ' + error);
})
;
}
This is what happens with a fulfilled Promise:
handleAsyncResult(Promise.resolve('fulfilled'));
Output:
finally
then fulfilled
This is what happens with a rejected Promise:
handleAsyncResult(Promise.reject('rejected'));
Output:
finally
catch rejected
Promise.withResolvers()
[ES2024]The most common way of creating and resolving a Promise is via the Promise
constructor:
new Promise(
(resolve, reject) => { ··· }
);
One limitation of creating Promises like that is that the settlement functions resolve
and reject
are meant to only be used inside the callback. Sometimes we want to use them outside of it. That’s when the following static factory method is useful:
const { promise, resolve, reject } = Promise.withResolvers();
This is what using that factory method looks like:
{
const { promise, resolve, reject } = Promise.withResolvers();
resolve('fulfilled');
assert.equal(
await promise,
'fulfilled'
);
}
{
const { promise, resolve, reject } = Promise.withResolvers();
reject('rejected');
try {
await promise;
} catch (err) {
assert.equal(err, 'rejected');
}
}
We can implement Promise.withResolvers()
as follows:
function promiseWithResolvers() {
let resolve;
let reject;
const promise = new Promise(
(res, rej) => {
// Executed synchronously!
resolve = res;
reject = rej;
});
return {promise, resolve, reject};
}
class OneElementQueue {
#promise = null;
#resolve = null;
constructor() {
const { promise, resolve } = Promise.withResolvers();
this.#promise = promise;
this.#resolve = resolve;
}
get() {
return this.#promise;
}
put(value) {
this.#resolve(value);
}
}
{ // Putting before getting
const queue = new OneElementQueue();
queue.put('one');
assert.equal(
await queue.get(),
'one'
);
}
{ // Getting before putting
const queue = new OneElementQueue();
setTimeout(
// Runs after `await` pauses the current execution context
() => queue.put('two'),
0
);
assert.equal(
await queue.get(),
'two'
);
}
These are some of the advantages of Promises over plain callbacks when it comes to handling one-off results:
The type signatures of Promise-based functions and methods are cleaner: if a function is callback-based, some parameters are about input, while the one or two callbacks at the end are about output. With Promises, everything output-related is handled via the returned value.
Chaining asynchronous processing steps is more convenient.
Promises handle both asynchronous errors (via rejections) and synchronous errors: Inside the callbacks for new Promise()
, .then()
, and .catch()
, exceptions are converted to rejections. In contrast, if we use callbacks for asynchronicity, exceptions are normally not handled for us; we have to do it ourselves.
Promises are a single standard that is slowly replacing several, mutually incompatible alternatives. For example, in Node.js, many functions are now available in Promise-based versions. And new asynchronous browser APIs are usually Promise-based.
One of the biggest advantages of Promises involves not working with them directly: they are the foundation of async functions, a synchronous-looking syntax for performing asynchronous computations. Asynchronous functions are covered in the next chapter.
Seeing Promises in action helps with understanding them. Let’s look at examples.
Consider the following text file person.json
with JSON data in it:
{
"first": "Jane",
"last": "Doe"
}
Let’s look at two versions of code that reads this file and parses it into an object. First, a callback-based version. Second, a Promise-based version.
The following code reads the contents of this file and converts it to a JavaScript object. It is based on Node.js-style callbacks:
import * as fs from 'node:fs';
fs.readFile('person.json',
(error, text) => {
if (error) { // (A)
// Failure
assert.fail(error);
} else {
// Success
try { // (B)
const obj = JSON.parse(text); // (C)
assert.deepEqual(obj, {
first: 'Jane',
last: 'Doe',
});
} catch (e) {
// Invalid JSON
assert.fail(e);
}
}
});
fs
is a built-in Node.js module for file system operations. We use the callback-based function fs.readFile()
to read a file whose name is person.json
. If we succeed, the content is delivered via the parameter text
as a string. In line C, we convert that string from the text-based data format JSON into a JavaScript object. JSON
is an object with methods for consuming and producing JSON. It is part of JavaScript’s standard library and documented later in this book.
Note that there are two error-handling mechanisms: the if
in line A takes care of asynchronous errors reported by fs.readFile()
, while the try
in line B takes care of synchronous errors reported by JSON.parse()
.
The following code uses readFile()
from node:fs/promises
, the Promise-based version of fs.readFile()
:
import {readFile} from 'node:fs/promises';
readFile('person.json')
.then(text => { // (A)
// Success
const obj = JSON.parse(text);
assert.deepEqual(obj, {
first: 'Jane',
last: 'Doe',
});
})
.catch(err => { // (B)
// Failure: file I/O error or JSON syntax error
assert.fail(err);
});
Function readFile()
returns a Promise. In line A, we specify a success callback via method .then()
of that Promise. The remaining code in then
’s callback is synchronous.
.then()
returns a Promise, which enables the invocation of the Promise method .catch()
in line B. We use it to specify a failure callback.
Note that .catch()
lets us handle both the asynchronous errors of readFile()
and the synchronous errors of JSON.parse()
because exceptions inside a .then()
callback become rejections.
XMLHttpRequest
We have previously seen the event-based XMLHttpRequest
API for downloading data in web browsers. The following function promisifies that API:
function httpGet(url) {
return new Promise(
(resolve, reject) => {
const xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onload = () => {
if (xhr.status === 200) {
resolve(xhr.responseText); // (A)
} else {
// Something went wrong (404, etc.)
reject(new Error(xhr.statusText)); // (B)
}
}
xhr.onerror = () => {
reject(new Error('Network error')); // (C)
};
xhr.open('GET', url);
xhr.send();
});
}
Note how the results and errors of XMLHttpRequest
are handled via resolve()
and reject()
:
This is how to use httpGet()
:
httpGet('http://example.com/textfile.txt')
.then(content => {
assert.equal(content, 'Content of textfile.txt\n');
})
.catch(error => {
assert.fail(error);
});
Exercise: Timing out a Promise
exercises/promises/promise_timeout_test.mjs
Most JavaScript platforms support Fetch, a Promise-based API for downloading data. Think of it as a Promise-based version of XMLHttpRequest
. The following is an excerpt of the API:
interface Body {
text() : Promise<string>;
···
}
interface Response extends Body {
···
}
declare function fetch(str) : Promise<Response>;
That means we can use fetch()
as follows:
fetch('http://example.com/textfile.txt')
.then(response => response.text())
.then(text => {
assert.equal(text, 'Content of textfile.txt\n');
});
Exercise: Using the fetch API
exercises/promises/fetch_json_test.mjs
Rule for implementing functions and methods:
Don’t mix (asynchronous) rejections and (synchronous) exceptions.
This makes our synchronous and asynchronous code more predictable and simpler because we can always focus on a single error-handling mechanism.
For Promise-based functions and methods, the rule means that they should never throw exceptions. Alas, it is easy to accidentally get this wrong – for example:
// Don’t do this
function asyncFunc() {
doSomethingSync(); // (A)
return doSomethingAsync()
.then(result => {
// ···
});
}
The problem is that if an exception is thrown in line A, then asyncFunc()
will throw an exception. Callers of that function only expect rejections and are not prepared for an exception. There are three ways in which we can fix this issue.
We can wrap the whole body of the function in a try-catch
statement and return a rejected Promise if an exception is thrown:
// Solution 1
function asyncFunc() {
try {
doSomethingSync();
return doSomethingAsync()
.then(result => {
// ···
});
} catch (err) {
return Promise.reject(err);
}
}
Given that .then()
converts exceptions to rejections, we can execute doSomethingSync()
inside a .then()
callback. To do so, we start a Promise chain via Promise.resolve()
. We ignore the fulfillment value undefined
of that initial Promise.
// Solution 2
function asyncFunc() {
return Promise.resolve()
.then(() => {
doSomethingSync();
return doSomethingAsync();
})
.then(result => {
// ···
});
}
Lastly, new Promise()
also converts exceptions to rejections. Using this constructor is therefore similar to the previous solution:
// Solution 3
function asyncFunc() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
doSomethingSync();
resolve(doSomethingAsync());
})
.then(result => {
// ···
});
}
Most Promise-based functions are executed as follows:
The following code demonstrates that:
function asyncFunc() {
console.log('asyncFunc');
return new Promise(
(resolve, _reject) => {
console.log('new Promise()');
resolve();
});
}
console.log('START');
asyncFunc()
.then(() => {
console.log('.then()'); // (A)
});
console.log('END');
Output:
START
asyncFunc
new Promise()
END
.then()
We can see that the callback of new Promise()
is executed before the end of the code, while the result is delivered later (line A).
Benefits of this approach:
Starting synchronously helps avoid race conditions because we can rely on the order in which Promise-based functions begin. There is an example in the next chapter, where text is written to a file and race conditions are avoided.
Chaining Promises won’t starve other tasks of processing time because before a Promise is settled, there will always be a break, during which the event loop can run.
Promise-based functions always return results asynchronously; we can be sure that there is never a synchronous return. This kind of predictability makes code easier to work with.
More information on this approach
“Designing APIs for Asynchrony” by Isaac Z. Schlueter
The combinator pattern is a pattern in functional programming for building structures. It is based on two kinds of functions:
When it comes to JavaScript Promises:
Primitive functions include: Promise.resolve()
, Promise.reject()
Combinators include: Promise.all()
, Promise.race()
, Promise.any()
, Promise.allSettled()
. In each of these cases:
Next, we’ll take a closer look at the mentioned Promise combinators.
Promise.all()
This is the type signature of Promise.all()
:
Promise.all<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>): Promise<Array<T>>
Promise.all()
returns a Promise which is:
promises
are fulfilled.
promises
.
This is a quick demo of the output Promise being fulfilled:
const promises = [
Promise.resolve('result a'),
Promise.resolve('result b'),
Promise.resolve('result c'),
];
Promise.all(promises)
.then((arr) => assert.deepEqual(
arr, ['result a', 'result b', 'result c']
));
The following example demonstrates what happens if at least one of the input Promises is rejected:
const promises = [
Promise.resolve('result a'),
Promise.resolve('result b'),
Promise.reject('ERROR'),
];
Promise.all(promises)
.catch((err) => assert.equal(
err, 'ERROR'
));
Figure 42.2 illustrates how Promise.all()
works.
.map()
via Promise.all()
Array transformation methods such as .map()
, .filter()
, etc., are made for synchronous computations. For example:
function timesTwoSync(x) {
return 2 * x;
}
const arr = [1, 2, 3];
const result = arr.map(timesTwoSync);
assert.deepEqual(result, [2, 4, 6]);
What happens if the callback of .map()
is a Promise-based function (a function that maps normal values to Promises)? Then the result of .map()
is an Array of Promises. Alas, that is not data that normal code can work with. Thankfully, we can fix that via Promise.all()
: It converts an Array of Promises into a Promise that is fulfilled with an Array of normal values.
function timesTwoAsync(x) {
return new Promise(resolve => resolve(x * 2));
}
const arr = [1, 2, 3];
const promiseArr = arr.map(timesTwoAsync);
Promise.all(promiseArr)
.then(result => {
assert.deepEqual(result, [2, 4, 6]);
});
.map()
exampleNext, we’ll use .map()
and Promise.all()
to downlooad text files from the web. For that, we need the following tool function:
function downloadText(url) {
return fetch(url)
.then((response) => { // (A)
if (!response.ok) { // (B)
throw new Error(response.statusText);
}
return response.text(); // (C)
});
}
downloadText()
uses the Promise-based fetch API to download a text file as a string:
response
(line A).
response.ok
(line B) checks if there were errors such as “file not found”.
.text()
(line C) to retrieve the content of the file as a string.
In the following example, we download two text files:
const urls = [
'http://example.com/first.txt',
'http://example.com/second.txt',
];
const promises = urls.map(
url => downloadText(url));
Promise.all(promises)
.then(
(arr) => assert.deepEqual(
arr, ['First!', 'Second!']
));
Promise.all()
This is a simplified implementation of Promise.all()
(e.g., it performs no safety checks):
function all(iterable) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let elementCount = 0;
let result;
let index = 0;
for (const promise of iterable) {
// Preserve the current value of `index`
const currentIndex = index;
promise.then(
(value) => {
result[currentIndex] = value;
elementCount++;
if (elementCount === result.length) {
resolve(result); // (A)
}
},
(err) => {
reject(err); // (B)
});
index++;
}
if (index === 0) {
resolve([]);
return;
}
// Now we know how many Promises there are in `iterable`.
// We can wait until now with initializing `result` because
// the callbacks of .then() are executed asynchronously.
result = new Array(index);
});
}
The two main locations where the result Promise is settled are line A and line B. After one of them settled, the other can’t change the settlement value anymore because a Promise can only be settled once.
Promise.race()
This is the type signature of Promise.race()
:
Promise.race<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>): Promise<T>
Promise.race()
returns a Promise q
which is settled as soon as the first Promise p
among promises
is settled. q
has the same settlement value as p
.
In the following demo, the settlement of the fulfilled Promise (line A) happens before the settlement of the rejected Promise (line B). Therefore, the result is also fulfilled (line C).
const promises = [
new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
setTimeout(() => resolve('result'), 100)), // (A)
new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
setTimeout(() => reject('ERROR'), 200)), // (B)
];
Promise.race(promises)
.then((result) => assert.equal( // (C)
result, 'result'));
In the next demo, the rejection happens first:
const promises = [
new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
setTimeout(() => resolve('result'), 200)),
new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
setTimeout(() => reject('ERROR'), 100)),
];
Promise.race(promises)
.then(
(result) => assert.fail(),
(err) => assert.equal(
err, 'ERROR'));
Note that the Promise returned by Promise.race()
is settled as soon as the first among its input Promises is settled. That means that the result of Promise.race([])
is never settled.
Figure 42.3 illustrates how Promise.race()
works.
Promise.race()
to time out a PromiseIn this section, we are going to use Promise.race()
to time out Promises. We will be using the following helper functions:
/**
* Returns a Promise that is resolved with `value`
* after `ms` milliseconds.
*/
function resolveAfter(ms, value=undefined) {
return new Promise((resolve, _reject) => {
setTimeout(() => resolve(value), ms);
});
}
/**
* Returns a Promise that is rejected with `reason`
* after `ms` milliseconds.
*/
function rejectAfter(ms, reason=undefined) {
return new Promise((_resolve, reject) => {
setTimeout(() => reject(reason), ms);
});
}
This function times out a Promise:
function timeout(timeoutInMs, promise) {
return Promise.race([
promise,
rejectAfter(timeoutInMs,
new Error('Operation timed out')
),
]);
}
timeout()
returns a Promise whose settlement is the same as the one of whichever Promise settles first among the following two:
promise
timeoutInMs
milliseconds
To produce the second Promise, timeout()
uses the fact that resolving a pending Promise with a rejected Promise leads to the former being rejected.
Let’s see timeout()
in action. Here, the input Promise is fulfilled before the timeout. Therefore, the output Promise is fulfilled.
timeout(200, resolveAfter(100, 'Result!'))
.then(result => assert.equal(result, 'Result!'));
Here, the timeout happens before the input Promise is fulfilled. Therefore, the output Promise is rejected.
timeout(100, resolveAfter(200, 'Result!'))
.catch(err => assert.deepEqual(err, new Error('Operation timed out')));
It is important to understand what “timing out a Promise” really means:
That is, timing out only prevents the input Promise from affecting the output (since a Promise can only be settled once). But it does not stop the asynchronous operation that produced the input Promise.
Promise.race()
This is a simplified implementation of Promise.race()
(e.g., it performs no safety checks):
function race(iterable) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
for (const promise of iterable) {
promise.then(
(value) => {
resolve(value); // (A)
},
(err) => {
reject(err); // (B)
});
}
});
}
The result Promise is settled in either line A or line B. Once it is, the settlement value can’t be changed anymore.
Promise.any()
[ES2021]
This is the type signature of Promise.any()
:
Promise.any<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>): Promise<T>
Promise.any()
returns a Promise p
. How it is settled, depends on the parameter promises
(which refers to an iterable over Promises):
p
is resolved with that Promise.
p
is rejected with an instance of AggregateError
that contains all rejection values.
Figure 42.4 illustrates how Promise.any()
works.
AggregateError
[ES2021]This is the type signature of AggregateError
(a subclass of Error
):
class AggregateError extends Error {
// Instance properties (complementing the ones of Error)
errors: Array<any>;
constructor(
errors: Iterable<any>,
message: string = '',
options?: ErrorOptions // ES2022
);
}
interface ErrorOptions {
cause?: any; // ES2022
}
This is what happens if one Promise is fulfilled:
const promises = [
Promise.reject('ERROR A'),
Promise.reject('ERROR B'),
Promise.resolve('result'),
];
Promise.any(promises)
.then((result) => assert.equal(
result, 'result'
));
This is what happens if all Promises are rejected:
const promises = [
Promise.reject('ERROR A'),
Promise.reject('ERROR B'),
Promise.reject('ERROR C'),
];
Promise.any(promises)
.catch((aggregateError) => assert.deepEqual(
aggregateError.errors,
['ERROR A', 'ERROR B', 'ERROR C']
));
Promise.any()
vs. Promise.all()
There are two ways in which Promise.any()
and Promise.all()
can be compared:
Promise.all()
: First input rejection rejects the result Promise or its fulfillment value is an Array with input fulfillment values.
Promise.any()
: First input fulfillment fulfills the result Promise or its rejection value is an Array with input rejection values (inside an error object).
Promise.all()
is interested in all fulfillments. The opposite case (at least one rejection) leads to a rejection.
Promise.any()
is interested in the first fulfillment. The opposite case (only rejections) leads to a rejection.
Promise.any()
vs. Promise.race()
Promise.any()
and Promise.race()
are also related, but interested in different things:
Promise.race()
is interested in settlements. The Promise which is settled first, “wins”. In other words: We want to know about the asynchronous computation that terminates first.
Promise.any()
is interested in fulfillments. The Promise which is fulfilled first, “wins”. In other words: We want to know about the asynchronous computation that succeeds first.
The main – relatively rare – use case for .race()
is timing out Promises. The use cases for .any()
are broader. We’ll look at them next.
Promise.any()
We use Promise.any()
if we have multiple asynchronous computations and we are only interested in the first successful one. In a way, we let the computations compete with each other and use whichever one is fastest.
The following code demonstrates what that looks like when downloading resources:
const resource = await Promise.any([
fetch('http://example.com/first.txt')
.then(response => response.text()),
fetch('http://example.com/second.txt')
.then(response => response.text()),
]);
The same pattern enables us to use whichever module downloads more quickly:
const mylib = await Promise.any([
import('https://primary.example.com/mylib'),
import('https://secondary.example.com/mylib'),
]);
For comparison, this is the code we’d use if the secondary server is only a fallback – in case the primary server fails:
let mylib;
try {
mylib = await import('https://primary.example.com/mylib');
} catch {
mylib = await import('https://secondary.example.com/mylib');
}
Promise.any()
?A simple implementation of Promise.any()
is basically a mirror version of the implementation of Promise.all()
.
Promise.allSettled()
[ES2020]
This time, the type signatures are a little more complicated. Feel free to skip ahead to the first demo, which should be easier to understand.
This is the type signature of Promise.allSettled()
:
Promise.allSettled<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>)
: Promise<Array<SettlementObject<T>>>
It returns a Promise for an Array whose elements have the following type signature:
type SettlementObject<T> = FulfillmentObject<T> | RejectionObject;
interface FulfillmentObject<T> {
status: 'fulfilled';
value: T;
}
interface RejectionObject {
status: 'rejected';
reason: unknown;
}
Promise.allSettled()
returns a Promise out
. Once all promises
are settled, out
is fulfilled with an Array. Each element e
of that Array corresponds to one Promise p
of promises
:
If p
is fulfilled with the fulfillment value v
, then e
is
{ status: 'fulfilled', value: v }
If p
is rejected with the rejection value r
, then e
is
{ status: 'rejected', reason: r }
Unless there is an error when iterating over promises
, the output Promise out
is never rejected.
Figure 42.5 illustrates how Promise.allSettled()
works.
Promise.allSettled()
This is a quick first demo of how Promise.allSettled()
works:
Promise.allSettled([
Promise.resolve('a'),
Promise.reject('b'),
])
.then(arr => assert.deepEqual(arr, [
{ status: 'fulfilled', value: 'a' },
{ status: 'rejected', reason: 'b' },
]));
Promise.allSettled()
The next example is similar to the .map()
plus Promise.all()
example (from which we are borrowing the function downloadText()
): We are downloading multiple text files whose URLs are stored in an Array. However, this time, we don’t want to stop when there is an error, we want to keep going. Promise.allSettled()
allows us to do that:
const urls = [
'http://example.com/exists.txt',
'http://example.com/missing.txt',
];
const result = Promise.allSettled(
urls.map(u => downloadText(u))
);
result.then(
(arr) => {
assert.deepEqual(
arr,
[
{
status: 'fulfilled',
value: 'Hello!',
},
{
status: 'rejected',
reason: new Error(),
},
]
)
}
);
Promise.allSettled()
This is a simplified implementation of Promise.allSettled()
(e.g., it performs no safety checks):
function allSettled(iterable) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let elementCount = 0;
let result;
function addElementToResult(i, elem) {
result[i] = elem;
elementCount++;
if (elementCount === result.length) {
resolve(result);
}
}
let index = 0;
for (const promise of iterable) {
// Capture the current value of `index`
const currentIndex = index;
promise.then(
(value) => addElementToResult(
currentIndex, {
status: 'fulfilled',
value
}),
(reason) => addElementToResult(
currentIndex, {
status: 'rejected',
reason
}));
index++;
}
if (index === 0) {
resolve([]);
return;
}
// Now we know how many Promises there are in `iterable`.
// We can wait until now with initializing `result` because
// the callbacks of .then() are executed asynchronously.
result = new Array(index);
});
}
For a Promise combinator, short-circuiting means that the output Promise is settled early – before all input Promises are settled. The following combinators short-circuit:
Promise.all()
: The output Promise is rejected as soon as one input Promise is rejected.
Promise.race()
: The output Promise is settled as soon as one input Promise is settled.
Promise.any()
: The output Promise is fulfilled as soon as one input Promise is fulfilled.
Once again, settling early does not mean that the operations behind the ignored Promises are stopped. It just means that their settlements are ignored.
Promise.all()
(advanced)Consider the following code:
const asyncFunc1 = () => Promise.resolve('one');
const asyncFunc2 = () => Promise.resolve('two');
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
assert.equal(result1, 'one');
return asyncFunc2();
})
.then(result2 => {
assert.equal(result2, 'two');
});
Using .then()
in this manner executes Promise-based functions sequentially: only after the result of asyncFunc1()
is settled will asyncFunc2()
be executed.
Promise.all()
helps execute Promise-based functions more concurrently:
Promise.all([asyncFunc1(), asyncFunc2()])
.then(arr => {
assert.deepEqual(arr, ['one', 'two']);
});
Tip for determining how “concurrent” asynchronous code is: Focus on when asynchronous operations start, not on how their Promises are handled.
For example, each of the following functions executes asyncFunc1()
and asyncFunc2()
concurrently because they are started at nearly the same time.
function concurrentAll() {
return Promise.all([asyncFunc1(), asyncFunc2()]);
}
function concurrentThen() {
const p1 = asyncFunc1();
const p2 = asyncFunc2();
return p1.then(r1 => p2.then(r2 => [r1, r2]));
}
On the other hand, both of the following functions execute asyncFunc1()
and asyncFunc2()
sequentially: asyncFunc2()
is only invoked after the Promise of asyncFunc1()
is fulfilled.
function sequentialThen() {
return asyncFunc1()
.then(r1 => asyncFunc2()
.then(r2 => [r1, r2]));
}
function sequentialAll() {
const p1 = asyncFunc1();
const p2 = p1.then(() => asyncFunc2());
return Promise.all([p1, p2]);
}
Promise.all()
is fork-joinPromise.all()
is loosely related to the concurrency pattern “fork join”. Let’s revisit an example that we have encountered previously:
Promise.all([
// (A) fork
downloadText('http://example.com/first.txt'),
downloadText('http://example.com/second.txt'),
])
// (B) join
.then(
(arr) => assert.deepEqual(
arr, ['First!', 'Second!']
));
This section gives tips for chaining Promises.
Problem:
// Don’t do this
function foo() {
const promise = asyncFunc();
promise.then(result => {
// ···
});
return promise;
}
Computation starts with the Promise returned by asyncFunc()
. But afterward, computation continues and another Promise is created via .then()
. foo()
returns the former Promise, but should return the latter. This is how to fix it:
function foo() {
const promise = asyncFunc();
return promise.then(result => {
// ···
});
}
Problem:
// Don’t do this
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
return asyncFunc2()
.then(result2 => { // (A)
// ···
});
});
The .then()
in line A is nested. A flat structure would be better:
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
return asyncFunc2();
})
.then(result2 => {
// ···
});
This is another example of avoidable nesting:
// Don’t do this
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
if (result1 < 0) {
return asyncFuncA()
.then(resultA => 'Result: ' + resultA);
} else {
return asyncFuncB()
.then(resultB => 'Result: ' + resultB);
}
});
We can once again get a flat structure:
asyncFunc1()
.then(result1 => {
return result1 < 0 ? asyncFuncA() : asyncFuncB();
})
.then(resultAB => {
return 'Result: ' + resultAB;
});
In the following code, we actually benefit from nesting:
db.open()
.then(connection => { // (A)
return connection.select({ name: 'Jane' })
.then(result => { // (B)
// Process result
// Use `connection` to make more queries
})
// ···
.finally(() => {
connection.close(); // (C)
});
})
We are receiving an asynchronous result in line A. In line B, we are nesting so that we have access to variable connection
inside the callback and in line C.
Problem:
// Don’t do this
class Model {
insertInto(db) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { // (A)
db.insert(this.fields)
.then(resultCode => {
this.notifyObservers({event: 'created', model: this});
resolve(resultCode);
}).catch(err => {
reject(err);
})
});
}
// ···
}
In line A, we are creating a Promise to deliver the result of db.insert()
. That is unnecessarily verbose and can be simplified:
class Model {
insertInto(db) {
return db.insert(this.fields)
.then(resultCode => {
this.notifyObservers({event: 'created', model: this});
return resultCode;
});
}
// ···
}
The key idea is that we don’t need to create a Promise; we can return the result of the .then()
call. An additional benefit is that we don’t need to catch and re-reject the failure of db.insert()
. We simply pass its rejection on to the caller of .insertInto()
.
Unless noted otherwise, the functionality was introduced in ECMAScript 6 (which is when Promises were added to the language).
Glossary:
Promise.all()
Promise.all<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>)
: Promise<Array<T>>
P
: if all input Promises are fulfilled.
P
: if one input Promise is rejected.
Promise.race()
Promise.race<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>)
: Promise<T>
P
: if the first input Promise is settled.
Promise.any()
[ES2021]
Promise.any<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>): Promise<T>
P
: if one input Promise is fulfilled.
P
: if all input Promises are rejected.
AggregateError
that contains the rejection values of the input Promises.
This is the type signature of AggregateError
(a few members were omitted):
class AggregateError {
constructor(errors: Iterable<any>, message: string);
get errors(): Array<any>;
get message(): string;
}
Promise.allSettled()
[ES2020]
Promise.allSettled<T>(promises: Iterable<Promise<T>>)
: Promise<Array<SettlementObject<T>>>
P
: if all input Promise are settled.
P
: if there is an error when iterating over the input Promises.
This is the type signature of SettlementObject
:
type SettlementObject<T> = FulfillmentObject<T> | RejectionObject;
interface FulfillmentObject<T> {
status: 'fulfilled';
value: T;
}
interface RejectionObject {
status: 'rejected';
reason: unknown;
}